Travis Kelsey has hinted that he plans to change his last name after marrying Taylor Swift.
The NFL athlete, 36, on Tuesday liked an Instagram post from the “Bussin With the Boys” podcast in which hosts Will Compton and Taylor Lewan discussed whether Swift would change her last name to Kelsey after marriage.
A guest on the podcast said that Swift is “much more world famous” than Kelsey and that Kelsey would have to change her name. The hosts joked that while “Travis Swift” would be a perfect name for Kelsey, the name “Taylor Kelsey” would also sound nice.
And they came up with two names: “Swift-Kelce,” a hyphenated surname.
“No, you should go to Swift-Kells, Travis Swift-Kells,” they said enthusiastically.
Fans loved that Kelsey liked the post, with one fan commenting: “Funny that Travis likes this 😂😂 so he’s perfect for her.”
Another wrote: “I’m glad Travis liked this video 😂😍.”
Kelsey proposed to Swift in August 2025 after two years of dating. A source told Page Six that the couple plans to wed this summer in New York City.
The couple wasn’t shy about going out on a date night in public before their big day.
On Saturday, they watched a Knicks game in New York, and Kelce, an Ohio native, was of course rooting for the Cleveland Cavaliers. Although the Cavaliers lost, Kelce seemed to be having fun, even chugging a beer courtside as Swift looked on in amusement.
With the wedding just weeks away, attorney Sarah Luette, a partner in Blank Rome’s Marriage and Family Law Group, spoke exclusively to Page Six about what a prenuptial agreement between the couple might entail.
Under a prenuptial non-disclosure agreement, the two may be prohibited from discussing their marriage, but the 36-year-old pop star may still retain the right to sing about their relationship.
“Swift and Kelce may wish to include terms that promote confidentiality and privacy,” Reut, who does not represent the parties, told us. “This may include non-disparagement or non-disclosure terms regarding their relationship.”
“In Taylor’s case, she probably wouldn’t want to include a clause restricting her from singing about her relationships in her songs, especially since there’s always so much speculation about the subject matter of her songwriting,” he added.
